Anyone can make the confirmation, so at least I was able to confirm my own posts.
In the Wikimedia Foundation's wikis, contributions from new users are not automatically visible, but must be marked as such by a so-called viewer. The status as a passive viewer is obtained after a certain period of time. Your own posts are then automatically marked as viewed. The status as an active viewer, i.e. that you can also view the posts of others, requires even more corresponding edits. Perhaps in the long term we can also think about adapting the whole system. But I can't say exactly how much work this would involve in the background.
The other big advantage, just to mention it here, is that every change is traceable and therefore it is clear who made the mistake, so that you can correct the whole thing or possibly talk to people about it. This is not meant to imply that people should be held liable, but if someone has made a mistake in several articles, even if it is only a copying error, you can search through the users edits and correct them.
